ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Game
Chassis Supplier - Update 2

md-lock
This topic has been closed by the moderator Jack Basford
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 2 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5317
7 days ago

Juan
(Use the botton translation)
Hola nono, yo pierdo 4,1M pero con la mejora de segundo centro de instalación, esa mejora te ayuda a ahorrar 500k, con 10/10 clientes sin mejoras perderás 5M si no me equivoco pero si tienes las mejoras de ahorro de proveedor al máximo ahorrarás 2M el tema es mejorarlo porque por lo menos yo me enfocaría en las mejoras de rendimiento y luego del estado del chasis, yo creo que la manera de ganar puntos en chasis con clientes no es mala idea, más que nada original lo malo es ir viendo quien usa cuentas farm, es algo que es malo literalmente es hacer trampa, pero yo creo que la idea del negocio del chasis es para ser proveedor de nivel alto y darles chasis a los niveles de 29 para abajo ya que no pueden crear uno, espero que el tema se solucione pronto, saludos...



You are correct about the chassis facility upgrades to save money, but I think there is a problem with how the game calculates the cost and income from chassis supplier. In your situation, if you continue to lose 4.1M, after 100 races, you will lose 410M total. From what I can see in the financial history page, it tells me that I had a cost for "Supplied Components" which matches my cost shown on the Chassis Supplier page. 


However, it does not show any proof of income from my customers, even though I know exactly when one of them raced today. According to the tutorial, the customer pays money only when they race, which is a different and fair system compared to the engine supplier. If I am correct, this should mean that we are supposed to see different income amounts in our financial history for each customer entry after they complete a race.

Unless there is a way to make more money, eventually a lot of suppliers will be forced to stop accepting new customers, or even remove some of them to lower the cost of operations.
md-quotelink
medal 5118
7 days ago (Last edited by Juan Ignacio Rodríguez Ansaldi 7 days ago) Translate
No
You are correct about the chassis facility upgrades to save money, but I think there is a problem with how the game calculates the cost and income from chassis supplier. In your situation, if you continue to lose 4.1M, after 100 races, you will lose 410M total. From what I can see in the financial history page, it tells me that I had a cost for "Supplied Components" which matches my cost shown on the Chassis Supplier page. 


However, it does not show any proof of income from my customers, even though I know exactly when one of them raced today. According to the tutorial, the customer pays money only when they race, which is a different and fair system compared to the engine supplier. If I am correct, this should mean that we are supposed to see different income amounts in our financial history for each customer entry after they complete a race.

Unless there is a way to make more money, eventually a lot of suppliers will be forced to stop accepting new customers, or even remove some of them to lower the cost of operations.



I saw this AND now i have dude i would check

OH MY FRIEND x.x monoplaza = chasis
md-quotelink
medal 5143
7 days ago Translate

Rubinho
Hi Jack,

so if someone doesn't have any customers, he has wasted £100 million and will never earn anything? Whereas those with multiple accounts will earn money and, above all, performance.
Sorry, maybe I just don't understand, but as I see it, it seems that honest people will lose out and dishonest ones will have a big opportunity to take advantage.
PS: It's a bit suspicious that there are already suppliers with more than 10 customers, don't you think?



Exactly, please I don't want to be a chassis builder anymore, is that possible??
md-quotelink
medal 5366
7 days ago Translate

Jack
Very good points. I won't rush any decisions yet then, because that's exactly the kind of activity we want to encourage.

Hi Jack, the intention to encourage the community to exchange components is well-meaning, but we must be aware that there are those who try to take advantage of the situation by cheating, and this should not be tolerated.

In my opinion, if we want to continue with the idea that those who don't have customers will never be able to move forward and will continue to lose money, then at least we should give them the opportunity to cease chassis production. Any company in the world can decide to stop selling some of its products, so why is this not possible here? Those who decide to stop producing chassis will have lost £100 million and will see multi-users dominate the races, but at least they will not continue to lose money on a daily basis.

The game is losing participants every day. I tried to partecipate the IGP championships, but when you are lucky there are only four teams and almost no one uses strategy: in practice, they are championships for secondary users; I do not think this is the intention of the staff...
md-quotelink
medal 5545
6 days ago
Can I get a refund for the chassis supplier feature please?

It is taking away my enjoyment of the game.
md-quotelink
medal 5317
6 days ago
Before Uncle Bob can do that, he should be allowed to shut down/refund the chassis supplier system. I know a lot of people who wanted to do both at the same time found that there were weird glitches in what bonuses they were receiving from both sides.
md-quotelink
medal 5317
6 days ago
I am content with helping my customers win. They are also probably better at the game than me.

Previously there were only three costs for a car. Engine, Tires, and Fuel supplier. The chassis cost is entirely optional for both the supplier and customer. This makes sense because the only drawback is spending money in exchange for better chassis parts (and no attribute penalty) compared to a base attribute boost of zero.

That said, I believe the intention was for suppliers to eventually make some kind of money, no matter how small the profit may be, because there was no previous cost associated with chassis. The chassis supplier menu button summary says "Profit/Cost" which makes me think that. If that wasn't the intention, then perhaps the cost to become a supplier should have been a number of coins instead. We're going to have to spend coins to make up the difference if we plan on being competitive in our leagues while also being a supplier.
md-quotelink
medal 5118
6 days ago Translate

Manico
Hi Jack, the intention to encourage the community to exchange components is well-meaning, but we must be aware that there are those who try to take advantage of the situation by cheating, and this should not be tolerated.

In my opinion, if we want to continue with the idea that those who don't have customers will never be able to move forward and will continue to lose money, then at least we should give them the opportunity to cease chassis production. Any company in the world can decide to stop selling some of its products, so why is this not possible here? Those who decide to stop producing chassis will have lost £100 million and will see multi-users dominate the races, but at least they will not continue to lose money on a daily basis.

The game is losing participants every day. I tried to partecipate the IGP championships, but when you are lucky there are only four teams and almost no one uses strategy: in practice, they are championships for secondary users; I do not think this is the intention of the staff...


Well, I was lucky to find a gigantic community of a league of 300 people and that in total 192 ran in different categories, that is, 192÷6=32 from F1 to K6 and we are able to have more of a proportion index of how many people left that until now it is estimated that there are more than 40 people and they continue to drop and we continue to look for people who have been through the league or want to start here, we also have a team system depending on the category. You will have a team of 3 or 4 people, Manico I will leave you the information there and if you want to know more write to me, returning to the issue of the chassis I suppose that the iGP team is working hard to solve all this but I think that the most "urgent" thing is for the people who want to refund and then the chassis money system, as I showed in my screenshot I owe more than 180M of the chassis and I even had to pay tokens to get the money offer, they simply have to fix it, This message is not intended to be a criticism, it only seeks to propose the two most important objectives in the short term, greetings...

md-quotelink
medal 5118 CEO & CTO
6 days ago (Last edited by Frank Thomas 6 days ago)
A new update has been applied to address concerns about chassis data:
https://igpmanager.com/forum-thread/64621

Let's move discussion to the new thread.
md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 2 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.